Personal reflections about education as seen from the Superintendent's chair.
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
Ramblings on state assessments
This year's results will cause a bit of a stir. Proficiency has been recalculated so that it is no longer possible to receive a rating of "proficient" by answering only 17 of 65 questions correctly. Yes - last year it was possible to answer less than 30% of the questions correct in some grade levels and on some tests and still be classified as proficient.
This year students will need to answer at least 65% of the questions correctly to be called proficient. That is clearly a more accurate assessment of proficiency.
The larger question is what do these state assessments tell us. The test is given in October and the results are typically released several months later. Good teachers already have a sense of the strengths and weaknesses of their students. So does the test really help classroom teachers?
If the conversations between teachers and parents have been frequent and honest, the results will probably not be too much of a shock to parents either. My belief, and my hope, is that teachers have shared an accurate assessment of a child's performance with their parents so the MEAP probably gives little new information.
So if the state assessments are not really valuable for teachers or parents, for whom do they provide value?
The Michigan Department of Education uses the results to calculate Adequate Yearly Progress and to assign report card grades to schools and districts. These measures are used by parents and the public to gain a sense of the relative strengths and weaknesses of a district.
Supporters and detractors of public schools use the results to either promote or disparage public schools.
In the end state assessments should be one piece of a larger puzzle that attempts to identify if students are learning. Teachers and administrators must embrace the challenge of communicating if students are learning. Schools exist to help students learn. If we cannot demonstrate that the students who come to our schools are learning why should we expect the public to support us.
I understand that there are a lot of factors that contribute to student success. Parental involvement, community support, health, safety, and opportunities are just a few of the myriad of things that contribute to student success. As educators we must focus on the things that we can control - what goes on in a classroom each day, our attention to each student, our concern that every student makes progress.
External pressure - whether real or imagined from state assessments - is real. But our goal remains the same - educate every student who walks through the door.
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Something else to worry about - but this is actually important
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Wednesday, December 14, 2011
What does it all mean?
Of course, in the Michigan legislature this fall a bill was introduced to limit the salary of school superintendents. This proposed legislation failed to get out of committee.
The Michigan legislature also passed legislation this fall to require school employees to pay more for health insurance.
Why are lawmakers in Michigan intent on trying to rein in the cost of public employees salary and benefits while at the same time trying to pass legislation that would open Michigan to unlimited cyber-schools and a CEO that earns $5 million dollars?
Whether it is true or not the impression that is given is that certain members of the legislature believe that business will always provide a better value than a public school district. As a result, business is given a free pass and not asked to control costs in the same way that public schools are being asked to do because the default position of some legislators is that business will always be more efficient.
I would challenge that belief when the salary paid to the CEO of a company that is receiving public funds is five million dollars.
Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Monday, December 12, 2011
Wednesday, December 7, 2011
Meadows Band
If we don't like state assessments, how do we measure success?
This fall, principals in New York have risen up to protest the use of standardized assessments in teacher evaluations. Research, and common sense, supports their view that using a tool designed to do one thing to do something else can be done but it may not be the best or wisest thing to do. I have used a stapler as a hammer before. It worked but it certainly was not the most efficient or effective way to hammer the nail. State assessments are designed to measure student learning. We are now trying to use them to measure teacher effectiveness and student growth. It probably can be done but is it the best way to accomplish these important tasks.
A third point must also be made. There is money to be made in education - especially in the use of assessments. Pearson, a British company that bills itself as a leader in learning, recently reported that they had sales of approximately $4 billion US dollars and a profit of approximately $732 million dollars (stated in British pounds it looks this way -£2.6bn and operating profit of £469m). Selling tests to school systems is big business. One has to wonder if the push to test every student at every opportunity has more to do with corporate profit than it does with student learning.
Having said all of this, what is my point? I believe that schools have a responsibility to teach students. In saying that it means that we have to be able to show in real ways that students ARE learning. Schools also have a responsibility to measure whether administrators and teachers are being effective. \Administrator and teacher effectiveness has to include a connection to student learning. After all, that is why schools are in business. We cannot say that a teacher is effective if we cannot demonstrate that the students in that teacher's classroom are learning.
If educators, those who have invested their lives in schools and student learning, do not like standardized state assessments and do not believe that these are accurate measures of the learning that is occurring in classrooms, then we have to come up with an alternative. I would argue that the alternative cannot only be idiosyncratic, classroom-specific, teacher created assessments. These can certainly be included but there has to be a way to measure student learning with an external measurement if we are going to convince our parents and community members that students are learning.
Schools exist to help students learn. Administrators and teachers must be able to demonstrate that students are learning in their classroom. Railing against standardized assessments and state mandated tests may feel good but it does not accomplish a lot. I think we should spend more time working to create a system that will help us measure student learning, evaluate the effectiveness of administrators and teachers, and stand up to external critics who question whether students are learning, than we should arguing against the use of standardized tests.
Students come to our schools everyday to learn. We have to have a good, effective way to measure that.
Parents want to know if the teachers who are teaching their children are effective. We have to have a way to measure that.
Taxpayers, politicians, and community members want to know if schools are being effective. We have to have a way to measure that.
If we don't like standardized state assessments, how will we measure success?
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Friday, December 2, 2011
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Changing Times - What's True Now Has Been True Before
Our students face a world far different than the one we grew up in.
That's the conventional wisdom. On the one hand it's true. Technology change. Globalization. Social media. Access to information. Access anytime, anywhere.
But look at the changes that were faced in the past four decades. Computers. Cable television. The end of the Cold War. The rise of Japan and then China. The interstate highway system.
There is no doubt that the world we are heading into is different than the world that we are leaving behind. But that has always been the case.
My father lived in a small town in Oklahoma and rode his horse to school. His graduating class had 15 students in it. (H.K. Matthews - proud graduate of Fairland High School in Fairland, Oklahoma.)
The world is different now than it was when I was growing up. My world was different than the world my father grew up in. His world was different than the world his parents grew up in. (His mother entered the Oklahoma territory in a covered wagon.)
The world will be different next year and the year after that and the year after that.
What we know now is that the world will change. Back in 1947 there was probably not the same sense that the world was going to change so dramatically. But it did. Now we take it for granted.
But those who have been successful learned many of the skills that those who will be successful are going to need to learn.
In some ways the challenges are the same for the students in my school district as they were for the 15 graduating seniors of the class of 1947.
Are they prepared?
How can we (a school) prepare them?
We hear a lot about 21st century skills? But perhaps, the 21st century skills, are really just the skills that successful people have been developing throughout history.
- The ability to communicate
- The ability to adapt
- The ability to use technology
- The ability to develop relationships
- The ability to compute
- The ability to think
- The ability to understand
- The ability to see (vision)
What has been true is still true - those who will be successful learn to manage in changing times.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Friday, November 18, 2011
Thursday, November 17, 2011
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
Friday, November 11, 2011
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Sweet Music
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Novi High School Band-o-Rama Concert
Friday, November 4, 2011
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
Friday, October 28, 2011
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Monday, October 24, 2011
Friday, October 21, 2011
Thursday, October 20, 2011
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
Monday, October 10, 2011
Friday, October 7, 2011
Thursday, October 6, 2011
What should a Superintendent do?
What does a Supeintendent do?
My goal is to improve the Novi community School District. My work is doing those things that help us get better.
What is that work?
Since I began my work here in Novi I have had the oppotunity to talk with the board of Education about the direction of the district. Together we created four district goals. These goals are what I need to help the district accomplish. They are my work.
I will be held accountable for accomplishing these goals. To help me stay focused and to ensure that these goals will be accomplished, I have spent time identifying specific action steps. These action steps identify the work that will be done this year to help th district make progress on these goals.
I have listed the goals and the specific action steps that will be the focus of my work in Novi this year.
Goal One: The Novi Community School District will ensure that each student will make no less than one year’s growth in one year’s time.
1. Create a robust internal accountability system.
a. Reach consensus on specific assessments in math and reading that can be used in
grades K-12 to measure yearly growth.
Due December 2011
b. Create a framework for measuring yearly growth in science, social studies, and
writing that will begin to be used starting in the 2012-2013 school year.
Due April 2012
c. Create a mechanism to report yearly growth to stakeholders (students, parents,
community members, teachers, administrators, and the Board of Education).
Due June 2012
2. Measure yearly student growth with the NWEA.
a. Pre-test all students in grades 1-8 with the NWEA in September 2011 and identify
a growth goal for each student.
Due October 2011
b. Post-test all students in grades 1-8 with the NWEA in May 2012 and identify the
growth or progress each student made in the 2011-2012 school year.
Due June 2012
c. Provide a parent report for students in grades 1-8 based on the NWEA that will
identify specific learning activities that can be done over the summer.
Due June 2012
3. Staff the Office of Academic Services, within the existing budget parameters, to provide
the appropriate support to meet our yearly growth goal.
a. Create a Student Growth and Accountability position.
Due November 1, 2011
b. Analyze the needs within the Office of Academic Services and bring to the Board
of Education additional items for discussion and implementation as appropriate
and needed.
Ongoing
4. Create opportunities for teacher and administrator professional development outside of
the school day.
a. Create a Summer Institute for teachers and administrators to focus on improving
instructional practice.
Due summer 2012.
b. Analyze opportunities for teacher and administrator professional development and
implement and fund as appropriate and needed.
Ongoing
Goal Two: The Novi Community School District will ensure that all students achieve at a high level. (There will be no achievement gaps.)
1. Build a comprehensive K-12 plan for addressing the needs of students performing below
grade level.
a. Create a system that provides for classroom and out-of-classroom support with
input from teachers and administrators. (Pyramid of Intervention)
March 2012
2. Create opportunities for students to receive additional academic support.
a. Start Saturday enrichment blocks in cooperation with the Department of
Community Education open to all students but with a focus on students who need
additional skill development.
Due February 2012
b. Start two-week summer enrichment blocks in cooperation with the Department of
Community Education open to all students but with a focus on students who need
additional skills development.
Due Summer 2012
3. Staff the Office of Academic Services, within the existing budget parameters, to provide the appropriate support to monitor and support our goal of high achievement for all.
a. Create a Title 1/Title 2/Title 3 and ESL Supervisor position.
Due November 1, 2011
b. Analyze the needs within the Office of Academic Services and bring to the Board
of Education additional items for discussion and implementation as appropriate
and needed.
Ongoing
Goal Three: The Novi Community School District will evaluate and enhance opportunities for students while maintaining a minimum 10% fund balance.
1. Engage in a comprehensive review of current programs.
a. Create a rubric to provide a cost/benefit analysis of programs/clubs/activities.
Due December 2011
b. Make recommendations on any changes in time for the 2012-2013 budget
process.
Due February 2012
Goal Four: The Novi Community School District will improve organizational quality and
customer service by creating common standards, systems, and principles.
1. Analyze Central Office functions and processes to improve effectiveness and service.
Due as soon as practical
2. Evaluate processes and procedures of teacher and administrator evaluation to comply
with new legislation.
Due May 2012
3. Create a comprehensive process to solicit feedback from stakeholders on district
programs and processes.
Due February 2012
4. Create a comprehensive district communications strategy.
Due May 2012
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Monday, October 3, 2011
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Focusing on Reading
What kind of questions do good readers ask?
How does the reader's prior knowledge help?
How do readers get involved as they read?
These are the skills good readers use to create meaning and understand a text.